GSM498672

GEO first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

46/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This Drosophila melanogaster WGS dataset comprises 36bp short reads with moderate quality (94.4% Q20, 71.6% Q30), platform unspecified. The lower Q30 rate indicates greater base-calling uncertainty typical of older sequencing technologies; researchers should verify suitability for SNP calling or variant detection requiring high confidence.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.067 measured

pct q20 bases 94.4 measured

pct q30 bases 71.6 measured

gc content pct 47.7 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 29.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.19 measured

duplication rate pct 14.74 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 46/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 71.6 measured ×1 8%

duplication rate pct 14.74 measured ×0.5 79%

adapter content pct 0.19 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0