GSM797670

GEO first seen 2012

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

64/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq delivers good per-base accuracy (Q30=82.6%, Q20=92.8%) on 49 bp reads with elevated GC content (53.7%), suggesting possible bias toward GC-rich transcripts—read length and quality support standard transcript quantification, though GC-bias normalization methods should be considered during expression analysis.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 92.8 measured

pct q30 bases 82.6 measured

gc content pct 53.7 measured

mean read length 49 measured

mean base quality 33.1 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 88.76 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 64/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.6 measured ×1 63%

mean base quality 33.1 measured ×0.6 85%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 88.76 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 28 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0