← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,802 / 758 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2942764726498
reported
total reads
57331527127
reported
n content pct
0.788
measured
pct q20 bases
73.7
measured
pct q30 bases
52
measured
gc content pct
45.6
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
23.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.57
measured
duplication rate pct
7.25
measured
supplementary file types
BAM, BED, CEL, TXT, WIG
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
52
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0