← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
5.122
measured
pct q20 bases
19.8
measured
pct q30 bases
12.7
measured
gc content pct
45.3
measured
mean read length
76
measured
mean base quality
11.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.03
measured
duplication rate pct
0.82
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
12.7
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0