Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) whole-genome sequencing via AB 5500xl on ABI SOLID platform with 1.41 billion short reads and 77.9 billion bases. The reported 0% GC and 74.7% Q20 reflect colorspace bias inherent to SOLID chemistry and should be interpreted cautiously. Users familiar with ABI SOLID data processing may extract useful sequence, but standard Illumina-centric pipelines will struggle with this platform-specific encoding.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0