← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
400 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
305060296390
reported
total reads
1244448174
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
97.4
measured
pct q30 bases
93.5
measured
gc content pct
46.7
measured
mean read length
156.6
measured
mean base quality
36.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0.45
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93.5
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0.45
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0