← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Vigna angularis var. angularis
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
131 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
297351375234
reported
total reads
1116733495
reported
n content pct
0.019
measured
pct q20 bases
98.1
measured
pct q30 bases
94.5
measured
gc content pct
36.5
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0.06
measured
duplication rate pct
2.14
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94.5
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.06
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
2.14
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0