← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Hevea brasiliensis
Instrument
AB 3730xL Genetic Analyzer
Platform
CAPILLARY
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
287 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
549760922233
reported
total reads
3312714947
reported
n content pct
0.358
measured
pct q20 bases
95.8
measured
pct q30 bases
92.2
measured
gc content pct
36.4
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
36.2
measured
adapter content pct
22.15
measured
duplication rate pct
2.42
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36.2
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
22.15
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
2.42
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0