← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Rhizophagus irregularis DAOM 181602=DAOM 197198
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
15 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
83511665545
reported
total reads
255833008
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
96.3
measured
pct q30 bases
92.8
measured
gc content pct
28.3
measured
mean read length
126
measured
mean base quality
36.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.08
measured
duplication rate pct
0.44
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.8
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
36.1
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.08
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
0.44
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0