Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This GridION hybrid short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing dataset from Citrobacter amalonaticus totals 621 million reads and 244 billion bases; however, the anomalous 0% Q20 and Q30 bases indicate non-standard quality reporting or data submission error requiring independent verification. The 49.2% GC fits Gram-negative bacterial composition; if quality can be validated, the read volume supports complete genome assembly. Researchers must retrieve raw sequence files and verify base-call quality independently before committing to assembly or variant analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0