Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Spumella sp. NIES-1846 bulk RNA-seq via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 22.4 million reads (4.5 billion bases) and outstanding quality (98.6% Q20, 96.9% Q30). The 56.2% GC reflects this heterotrophic flagellate's genomic composition. This dataset supports transcriptome profiling of this poorly-characterized protist and may answer questions about nutrient-sensing and grazing-induced gene expression changes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0