Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
51/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Ophiorrhiza pumila bulk RNA-seq hybrid-read dataset completely failed quality thresholds with zero Q30 and Q20 bases and base quality 9.6 (effectively random); failed sequencing run unsuitable for any downstream analysis and requiring resequencing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0