Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mus musculus amplicon sequencing via 454 GS FLX Titanium with 956,716 reads and 516 million bases, read type unknown (low confidence) typical of 454 metadata gaps. The 94.8% Q20 and 56.5% GC are reasonable; longer 454 reads may offer advantages for certain targeted loci. Users should reconcile 454 chemistry limitations with their downstream analysis pipeline and verify marker-gene target.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0