Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Listeria monocytogenes (foodborne pathogen) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 1.07 billion reads and 146.1 billion bases at good quality (94.1% Q20, 85.8% Q30). The 37.6% GC and zero N-content reflect gram-positive bacterial composition. This dataset enables strain typing, virulence gene identification, and epidemic investigation of Listeria outbreaks.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0