Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
27/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Anaerobic digester metagenome whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 124.4 million reads and 37.3 billion bases at moderate quality (82.5% Q20, 70.1% Q30). The 55.5% GC and lower base accuracy reflect complex microbial communities in engineered systems. This dataset suits studying biogas-producing consortia and functional gene distribution but may require careful OTU clustering to manage sequencing error.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0