Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-seq dataset from Homo sapiens delivers 127 million reads and 23 billion bases with exceptional quality (99.3% Q20, 97.2% Q30), providing sensitive transcriptome profiling across a wide dynamic range of expression levels. The high fidelity enables accurate quantification of isoform structure, splicing variants, and lowly-expressed transcripts without extensive trimming. Researchers can confidently apply this for gene expression quantification, differential expression testing, and pathway inference, though the fixed 100–125 bp read length may limit de novo assembly and complex structural-variant discovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0