Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
45/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 whole-genome sequencing dataset from Mus spretus comprises 402 million reads and 79.6 billion bases for reference or comparative genomics studies. The 39% GC content is characteristic for mammalian genomes; however, the anomalous 0% Q30 bases and 75.2% Q20 metrics warrant independent quality verification before variant calling or assembly work. Researchers should retrieve raw quality distributions and confirm this organism against NCBI Taxonomy to ensure the dataset matches their intended target.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0