Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Listeria monocytogenes whole-genome sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 323.4 million reads and 124.3 billion bases at excellent quality (98.5% Q20, 97.7% Q30). The 38.8% GC and 0.035% N-content reflect gram-positive composition. The substantial coverage and quality enable robust variant discovery, pangenome construction, and phylogenetic resolution of this clinically important foodborne pathogen.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0