Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Homo sapiens amplicon dataset from Ion Torrent PGM provides targeted coverage (62 million reads, GC=45.3%) at modest per-base accuracy (Q30=50.6%)—Ion Torrent's systematic homopolymer biases may distort indel rates in microsatellite regions, best suited for large targeted variant sets where high depth compensates for lower per-base fidelity or for genotyping single-nucleotide polymorphisms where indel calling is not critical.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0