Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via Ion Torrent PGM delivers targeted genomic or mitochondrial locus coverage (17 million reads, GC=54.9%) with moderate per-base accuracy (Q30=59.2%)—Ion Torrent's characteristic homopolymer-dependent errors may inflate indel rates in repetitive regions, limiting precision for copy-number or SNP detection unless specialized error-correction algorithms are applied.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0