Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Candidatus Kryptonium thompsonii whole-genome assembly from Illumina MiSeq generated 15.4 million short reads (4.6 gigabases) with excellent quality (97.8% Q20, 97.3% Q30) and 37.2% GC (AT-rich bacterial genome). The high-fidelity data supports complete genome reconstruction and functional annotation of this uncultured bacterial candidate species.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0