Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Candidatus Kryptonium thompsonii whole-genome amplified (WGA) using Illumina MiSeq yielding 14.8 million reads and 4.47 billion bases with exceptional quality (97.8% Q20, 97.3% Q30, zero N-content). The low GC at 37.6% reflects this uncultured candidate bacterium's nucleotide bias. WGA amplification bias is inherent to this method; users should account for potential coverage heterogeneity in downstream genome assembly and annotation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0