Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hypsibius dujardini (tardigrade) whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with 133 million reads and 26.9 billion bases at 91.6% Q20 and 86% Q30. The 50.4% GC content and thorough 2-file structure suggest organized sample processing. This dataset addresses the unique genomic composition and extreme stress responses of tardigrades, though users should verify whether the sequence quality supports the demanding assembly requirements of eukaryotic genomes.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0