Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bos taurus whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 515.7 million reads and 128 billion bases at high coverage (47.4x, extrapolated) and excellent quality (98% Q20, 95.6% Q30). The 0.003% N-content and consistent base composition enable robust variant discovery and haplotype phasing in this major livestock species. This well-sequenced dataset suits genome-wide association studies and linkage mapping.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0