Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bos taurus whole-genome sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 356.9 million reads and 106.1 billion bases at moderate coverage (39.3x, extrapolated) but lower base quality (84.7% Q20, 74.8% Q30). The 0.01% N-content is good, yet the reduced accuracy may limit rare-variant discovery. This dataset suits reference genome assembly and SNP genotyping for agricultural breeding applications.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0