← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,367 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2466908344777
reported
total reads
25584812302
reported
mean coverage
795.8
extrapolated
n content pct
0.013
measured
pct q20 bases
99.7
measured
pct q30 bases
98.7
measured
gc content pct
57.5
measured
mean read length
19
measured
mean base quality
37.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
90.25
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 84/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
795.8
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
98.7
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
90.25
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
10 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0