Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
38/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing via 454 GS Junior provides targeted coverage (78K reads, 31.5 MB bases) with modest per-base accuracy (Q30=71.5%)—the small throughput and lower quality typical of 454 Junior hardware limit sensitivity for rare-variant or low-abundance allele detection, best suited for single-locus or few-locus confirmation studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0