Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens whole-exome sequencing (WES/targeted-capture) via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 80.2 million reads and 16.2 billion bases at good quality (97.7% Q20, 94.9% Q30). The 48.5% GC reflects genomic average in captured exonic regions. This dataset enables variant discovery in protein-coding regions for Mendelian disease studies or population-level association analyses.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0