Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Lachancea fermentati (budding yeast) whole-genome sequencing via 454 GS (listed as ILLUMINA, likely error) with 12.4 million reads and 931.4 million bases at moderate quality (90.8% Q20, 76.4% Q30). The elevated N-content (0.842%) and 42.6% GC are concerning. Users should verify platform and treat as draft-quality for preliminary fungal comparative genomics and phylogenetics, not reference-standard assembly.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0