← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
0/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
360 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
6002819100
reported
total reads
20009397
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
72.1
measured
pct q30 bases
62.2
measured
gc content pct
46.5
measured
mean read length
300
measured
mean base quality
28.6
measured
adapter content pct
56.75
measured
duplication rate pct
61.67
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 0/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
62.2
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
56.75
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
4 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0