Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
68/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq X Ten whole-genome sequencing dataset from Homo sapiens provides 1.76 billion reads and 530 billion bases with claimed 171× mean coverage, supporting haplotype phasing and structural-variant discovery. However, the anomalous 8.6% Q20 and 0.5% Q30 metrics are highly inconsistent with standard Illumina protocols and require independent verification before clinical or research use. Researchers should obtain raw sequencing metrics and consider this a suspect dataset until quality can be independently confirmed.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0