PRJEB13385

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

96/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

42 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 29929988200 reported

total reads 149649941 reported

n content pct 0.016 measured

pct q20 bases 98.2 measured

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured

gc content pct 33.7 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 39 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 12.56 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 96/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.9 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 12.56 measured ×0.5 86%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0