Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Triticum aestivum (wheat) bulk RNA-seq via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 351.5 million reads and 71 billion bases at high quality (97.6% Q20, 95.7% Q30). The 54.2% GC and comprehensive coverage suit expression profiling of this polyploid crop during development, stress responses, or grain filling. Users should account for wheat's complex genome structure and homeologous gene expression when mapping and quantifying transcripts.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0