Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This mouse metagenome amplicon dataset from Illumina MiSeq generated 8.7 million short reads (3.6 gigabases) with moderate quality (89.7% Q20, 76.9% Q30) and 52.2% GC. The data supports profiling of mouse microbiota, though the moderate Q30 rate requires consideration during downstream taxonomic assignment.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0