Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster) bulk RNA-seq via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 556 million reads and 41.7 billion bases at robust quality (98.1% Q20, 95.8% Q30). The 50.9% GC and high read depth enable both differential expression and isoform discovery in this cell-culture and biotech model organism. This dataset suits studying recombinant protein production optimization and cell-line dependent phenotypes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0