← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Bos taurus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
433 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2012548495778
reported
total reads
22714013342
reported
n content pct
0.069
measured
pct q20 bases
90.8
measured
pct q30 bases
85.1
measured
gc content pct
63.2
measured
mean read length
36
measured
mean base quality
33.1
measured
adapter content pct
2.15
measured
duplication rate pct
20.57
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
85.1
measured
×1
76%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0