← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Bos taurus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
137 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
719877953643
reported
total reads
7198138185
reported
n content pct
0.779
measured
pct q20 bases
96.9
measured
pct q30 bases
88.4
measured
gc content pct
42.2
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
33.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
2
measured
mean target coverage
13331.1
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 97/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
13331.1
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
88.4
measured
×1
92%
duplication rate pct
2
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0