PRJEB15226

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

79/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Citrobacter farmeri

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files

N numbers (samples, groups)

1,806 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 648225337403 reported

total reads 2259724234 reported

n content pct 0.397 measured

pct q20 bases 98.8 measured

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured

gc content pct 54.3 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 10.81 measured

duplication rate pct 16.13 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 79/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 16.13 measured ×0.5 75%

adapter content pct 10.81 measured ×0.4 30%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0