Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Metagenome whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 62.8 million reads and 18.8 billion bases at high quality (97.4% Q20, 93.8% Q30). The 47.8% GC and minimal N-content indicate good sequencing execution, though unspecified sample source limits interpretation. Users should verify whether this environmental or engineered-system metagenome matches their research context before assembly or binning.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0