← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Equus caballus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
53 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
119597741676
reported
total reads
474594213
reported
n content pct
0.023
measured
pct q20 bases
96.3
measured
pct q30 bases
92.7
measured
gc content pct
50.4
measured
mean read length
126
measured
mean base quality
35.4
measured
adapter content pct
92.26
measured
duplication rate pct
0.8
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 79/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.7
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0.8
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
92.26
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
13 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0