← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
63/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
234 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
5436523013276.001
reported
total reads
29125738597
reported
mean coverage
1753.7
extrapolated
n content pct
15.998
measured
pct q20 bases
21
measured
pct q30 bases
16.2
measured
gc content pct
35.2
measured
mean read length
90
measured
mean base quality
8.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
17.72
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 63/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
1753.7
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
16.2
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
17.72
measured
×0.5
70%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0