Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mixed-sample amplicon sequencing via Illumina MiSeq spanning 160 files with 18.2 million reads and 10.95 billion bases at 85.9% Q20 and 79.8% Q30. The moderate quality and 44.6% GC suggest marker-gene or functional amplicon profiling (16S, ITS, or equivalent). Users should verify the amplicon target, primer design, and whether this multi-sample dataset is adequately normalized for community composition analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0