Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Escherichia coli whole-genome sequencing via Illumina MiSeq with 17.7 million reads at ultra-high coverage (1,794.7x, extrapolated) providing 8.25 billion bases at 95.4% Q20 and 93% Q30. The extraordinary depth and quality enable error-correction, long-range haplotype phasing, and rare-variant calling in this model bacterium. Users should verify whether this extreme coverage is suitable for their application or represents resequencing of the same isolate.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0