PRJEB18686

BioProject first seen 2017

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

High-confidence human WES with perfect measured base quality (Q30 95.4%, adapter 0%, duplication 1.99%) but provisional grade (evidence 0.61) due to mean target coverage (60.5×) being extrapolated; measured metrics strongly support clinical-grade variant calling workflows.

Data type / assay

WES

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

8 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3749983841 reported

total reads 49943362 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.3 measured

pct q30 bases 95.4 measured

gc content pct 46.4 measured

mean read length 68 measured

mean base quality 36 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 1.99 measured

mean target coverage 60.5 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean target coverage 60.5 extrapolated ×1.2 100%

pct q30 bases 95.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.99 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 9 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0