Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This human metagenome amplicon-seq from Illumina MiSeq generated 14.6 million short reads (5.39 gigabases) with good quality (93.6% Q20, 92.2% Q30) and 51.1% GC. The dataset supports microbiome profiling with sufficient depth for species-level community resolution in human-associated microbial habitats.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0