Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
43/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bos taurus (cattle) whole-genome sequencing via Illumina Genome Analyzer II with 600.9 million reads and 43.2 billion bases at moderate quality (65.1% Q20, 51.9% Q30) and elevated N-content (1.446%). This older-instrument dataset produces lower base accuracy; users should apply stringent filtering and quality trimming before SNP discovery. The 16x coverage is modest for diploid animal genotyping and may miss heterozygous variants.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0