Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bacteroides fragilis (gut anaerobe) whole-genome short-read sequencing via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 12.3 million reads, 3.5 billion bases, and excellent quality (99.1% Q20, 96.9% Q30). The 44.4% GC reflects this gram-negative bacterium's genomic bias. This high-quality dataset is suitable for reference genome assembly, pangenome analysis, and studying virulence factor variability in this common pathobiont.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0