← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
89 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
118488779000
reported
total reads
592443895
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
95.7
measured
pct q30 bases
89.9
measured
gc content pct
46.6
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
35
measured
adapter content pct
10.94
measured
duplication rate pct
22.4
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 92/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.9
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
10.94
measured
×0.4
50%
duplication rate pct
22.4
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
12 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0