PRJEB20635

BioProject first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

38/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Canis lupus

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)

N numbers (samples, groups)

97 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 11096188599400 reported

total reads 74097152694 reported

n content pct 0.096 measured

pct q20 bases 97.2 measured

pct q30 bases 3.1 measured

gc content pct 46.2 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 27.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.13 measured

duplication rate pct 19.49 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 38/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 3.1 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 19.49 measured ×0.5 64%

adapter content pct 0.13 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0