Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJEB21025

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

56/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of a Lactobacillus (Lacticaseibacillus zeae) isolate on Illumina MiSeq, with the long 301 bp reads characteristic of that platform. Overall this dataset fails QC (56/100, grade F), and the verdict is dominated by one severe problem: an adapter content of 54.47% means more than half the reads carry residual adapter sequence, which is what zeroed out that metric and would corrupt assembly and mapping unless the reads are aggressively trimmed before any reuse. The base quality is mediocre but usable — Q30 at 82.1% and a mean base quality of 33.5 sit in acceptable-but-unremarkable territory — while the low 10.08% duplication rate and 0.024% N content are genuine strengths, so the data are salvageable if you trim hard rather than use them as-is. One practical caveat for the WGS use case: with only ~137 Mb of total bases the depth over even a small Lactobacillus genome is modest, so variant-calling sensitivity will be limited; note also that the core size/read-count figures are reported rather than independently measured, so confirm the post-trimming yield yourself before committing to this dataset.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Lacticaseibacillus zeae
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 137167506 reported
total reads 227853 reported
n content pct 0.024 measured
pct q20 bases 86.8 measured
pct q30 bases 82.1 measured
gc content pct 45.6 measured
mean read length 301 measured
mean base quality 33.5 measured
adapter content pct 54.47 measured
duplication rate pct 10.08 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 56/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.1 measured ×1 61%
duplication rate pct 10.08 measured ×0.5 94%
adapter content pct 54.47 measured ×0.4 0%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 94